Diggity: "If your strategy is publish blog posts and wait for Google traffic, you're done."

So I really don’t want to dissuade anyone from setting up a business online … but it doesn’t get much clearer than that folks.

Diggity’s latest email is all about his strategy for 2026. It’s a cold, hard take on where search is going and one thing Diggity does have, is data.

The real subtext for niche affiliate sites

Matt Diggity isn’t wrong.

AI has reshaped search, and lazy affiliate content is getting erased fast. But here’s the part that often gets glossed over in niche affiliate circles:

:backhand_index_pointing_right: What he’s recommending is not a tweak. It’s a full rebuild of the model.

For a solo affiliate running one or two sites, that can often be a big ask.


Why this is brutal for small affiliate sites

Let’s translate Matt’s advice into actual workload:

  • Original research → surveys, data collection, analysis

  • AI-citable structure → editorial-grade formatting

  • Topic clusters → 10–15 tightly linked articles per niche

  • Embedded commerce → tables, tools, UX work

  • Seasonal planning → content calendars + tracking

  • Authority assets → things big brands normally do

That’s publisher-level effort.

If you’re a niche affiliate trying to break out of the sandbox, this creates a nasty tension:

You need authority to rank - but you need rankings to justify building authority.

Classic chicken-and-egg. :chicken::egg:


The uncomfortable truth

Matt’s model works best if you already have:

  • A team

  • A budget

  • Or an established domain with links and trust

For many niche affiliates in 2026, that ship has sailed.

Which is why so many people are quietly asking:

Is it still worth building new niche sites from scratch in 2026?

Increasingly, the honest answer is: not first.


The alternative nobody’s saying out loud: parasite SEO

Ok ok … I know I’m always wanging on about parasite SEO … but here’s where the angle shifts.

Instead of building authority from zero, borrow it.

Parasite SEO flips the effort/reward ratio:

  • You publish on domains Google & AI already trust

  • You benefit from existing crawl priority, Discover eligibility, and citation likelihood

  • You focus on intent + monetization, not domain building

This way, AI visibility comes faster, your content gets indexed and referenced and you can test niches without a 12-month runway

For affiliates, that’s pure oxygen. I’ve seen it with my own eyes … my own parasite posts sitting right at the top of the SERP, directly adjacent to the AI overview.


Why parasite SEO fits the AI era better than new niche sites

Ironically, Matt’s own advice strengthens the parasite case:

  • AI prefers authoritative sources → parasites already are

  • Conversational queries → parasites rank well for them

  • Embedded commerce → easier on flexible platforms

  • Seasonal spikes → faster publish/update cycles

You still need good content - but you don’t need to be a media company.


The smart hybrid play (where this is going)

The real move in 2026 isn’t “only niche sites” or “only parasite SEO”.

It’s this:

  1. Validate niches and monetization via parasite SEO

  2. Capture AI & Discover traffic early

  3. Build cash flow and data

  4. Then decide what’s worth turning into a standalone site

That way, Matt’s advice becomes Phase 2, not a suicide mission.


Final take

Matt Diggity is right about where search is going.

But for niche affiliates the work he outlines is heavy and the runway is still long. With no guarantee at the end of it all. It’s a real risk.

Parasite SEO isn’t a shortcut - it’s a rebalancing of leverage.

In an AI-first search world, borrowing authority first may be the only way smaller affiliates survive long enough to build their own.

What do you think?